Bitcoin: the people’s money under threat in the name of sustainability
13 December, 2024
16 December, 2024
I wonder if the time has come to rename feminism in an era where the term has been so overused and distorted that its very meaning now repels us.
What is the right path for feminism?
It's a question with a straightforward answer: focusing on equality between men and women, without claiming that men who were born as such are the same as women. If you have a penis and testicles, you are biologically male, and it makes no difference if you want to be called Maria. Pretending that sex is determined by whims or individual feelings is a dangerous fiction. Identifying as a woman does NOT make you one.
Women do not need to perform femininity to be women; they are women from the moment they wake up to the moment they go to bed. Genetics settles the matter: if your chromosome pair is XY, there is nothing more to discuss. As a 2022 documentary film called ‘What is a Woman’ indicates (or as my daughter put it when I asked her): a woman is an adult human female. It’s that simple.
Competing Against Women as a Man
That’s why I feel like screaming every time I see a man on a sports podium after competing against women. He was born Manuel, with male genitalia, secondary sexual characteristics, and chromosomes, and he should compete against men. Doing otherwise is blatantly unfair.
The clueless feminazis, absolute victims of the 2030 Agenda, have no idea what’s happening. For the globalists — Soros, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Bill Gates, and the rest of their ilk — this isn’t about equality but about paedophilia and eliminating identities to create senseless individuals fighting over trivialities they’ve fabricated, all while thinking they’re free. They’re no more than donkeys chasing a carrot.
And if these feminazis haven’t realised it yet, women mean nothing to the globalist agenda. Neither do men! Whenever it comes to choosing between any other aspect of the 2030 Agenda and women, ask yourself: which one takes priority?
If women truly mattered, if equality truly mattered, situations like the ones we are witnessing would never happen. It’s absurd that a female swimmer has to shower and change after losing a competition to a two-metre-tall guy with a penis and testicles who, on top of everything, is completely off his rocker because he decided to call himself María and compete against women. Can someone explain to me what kind of mental stability a person with those characteristics might have?
Cases like Lia Thomas—a biological man and mediocre swimmer who switched to the women’s category and (suspiciously) racked up multiple titles after his "transition" in 2022—are cropping up all over the world. These are genuine absurdities that even have the blessing of sports organisations. Legislation is being drafted based on propaganda-driven feelings, creating a hypocritical society where opinions are taken as attacks and where any argument grounded in science and reason causes some group to take offence. It’s societal madness.
I respect transgender individuals, but just as I wouldn’t compete against 12-year-old girls in a tennis tournament, trans people must compete either with their biological sex or among themselves. Men cannot compete against women—it’s simply a matter of basic physical characteristics.
Silly, silly, silly. We women are being incredibly naive by allowing this to happen. All women should stop competing as a form of protest. Female athletes, please STOP SHOWING UP FOR COMPETITIONS. This cannot be tolerated. It’s an absolute disgrace.
Queer dictatorship
This is not speculation. Institutions are supporting this queer dictatorship with laws passed behind closed doors and under urgency. In a climate critical of dissent, a regulation was approved that does not require undergoing specific therapies or medical procedures to change the registered sex marker: the so-called "self-determination" law. The legislation, commonly referred to as the "Trans Law" (officially, the "Law for the Real and Effective Equality of Trans People and the Guarantee of LGTBI Rights"), came into effect in March 2023. Its aim is to make life easier for trans individuals who, until then, had to endure a burdensome, often futile and humiliating protocol. It’s clear that biology gives us a reproductive strategy and specific physical traits, while how we wish to present ourselves to the world is a separate matter. That’s the beauty of diversity. But the law doesn’t just allow us to change our treatment in society; it allows changing the mention of sex itself, dismantling whatever “sex” is supposed to mean. In fact, the text states that all rights applicable to the person will follow their new condition, with one exception. In sections 3 and 4 of Article 41, it explains that the rectification of the registry mention of sex will not alter the legal regime applicable to the person prior to the transition, in terms of the Law on Gender Violence Protection. In other words, if you were born male, you will not benefit from the protection you would have as a woman if you fit the cases covered by the Gender Violence law, but you could benefit from it if you are a woman who has transitioned legally to the male sex. The law itself recognizes the contradiction in trying to falsify sex—a reality that cannot be changed—causing legal insecurity and proving that the trans narrative is a fiction; a collective deception to alleviate individual dissatisfaction with stereotypes and gender roles and cope with social pressures.
The very government that passed the law deliberately uses ambiguous language when referring to self-determination, avoiding mentioning the actual statement that anyone can change their social and legal sex by simply expressing the desire, instead referring to “being who you really want to be” or “expanding rights.” In general terms.
Feminism has become distorted by everyone’s individual struggles. It has turned into a catch-all for dissent, a container for diverse claims. If historically it fought for the only difference between people to be the body, now we find men and women redefining what it means to belong to one sex or the other based on individual situations and emotions, with laws written according to these desires. Essentially, we’re leaving one rigid framework of what it means to be a “good woman” and moving into others, instead of recognizing that there are millions of ways to be a man or woman.
The system benefits from stripping “woman” of any meaning, turning women into consumable assets; interchangeable figures they pretend to give a voice to but do not truly listen to. Being a woman is now a revocable “identity.” We cannot allow ourselves to be ridiculed in this way or, at best, to continue being cast as eternal victims, objects oppressed without the ability to defend ourselves. Any viewpoint questioning the idea of women as victims of the system will be flagged and deactivated. The words of playwright and activist Simona Levi ring truer than ever when she says, “Victimizing feminism lowers the dignity of victims. It’s hard to consider it emancipating and transformative if it’s based on something fully accepted by the patriarchy. Being a victim is one of the patriarchal requirements of women. Women have only been seen as passive and victimized. Continuing this role doesn’t bring any substantial change to the condition of women.” For us to be equals, victimhood must be removed from the agenda of any movement.
Women do not need to wake up each morning believing they have a role to fit into to justify their actions. The vast majority have a broad outlook, one that includes men in their essential roles as sons, husbands, fathers, and grandfathers as well as friends, acquaintances, or coworkers. The reductionist perspective of a radical feminism that thrives on confrontation, marginalizing men and condemning any hint of femininity, offers nothing to those with real problems. If femininity is now punishable because it risks being perceived as the definition of “woman,” who sets the valid standards for it? I find it curious that even many empowering artist speeches are criticized for their choice of clothing. Radical feminists will end up measuring skirt lengths—it’s only a matter of time. I’ve always thought that “abolishing gender,” which is a complex structure beyond clothing and accessories, is a futile fight, similar to wanting to abolish the days of the week. It’s not about eliminating it, as that is impossible, but about not allowing it to define us or contaminate our drive to grow and connect.
The writer Carmen Posadas said in an interview in November 2022 about this hollow and weeping point of view: “I don’t like the victimist feminism that now dominates: ‘I haven’t achieved anything in life because men are evil and prevent me from expressing myself,’ ‘I’m a genius, but no one recognizes me because I’m a woman,’ and so on. Victimhood is quite poor policy because if someone else is always at fault, you never do anything to progress. I don’t identify with that. I know that there are lots of things that are harder for women, but I’m into the fight. Whoever resists wins, and whoever fights wins too.”
Paternalism is a frequent source of criticism. It’s understandable not to like being treated like children or half-finished people. So why do we forgive “maternalistic” attitudes that infantilize and prop up a bottom-up classism? Structural differences exist, built over decades of male-dominated history, but 21st-century claims cannot be the same as those from the 19th century or the 1960s. These structural differences are fought from within, rising to the occasion without losing sight that some women are much less fortunate than others.
Power quotas are also not what feminism needs, despite their symbolic value, as they bring up issues like motherhood and difficulties in work-life balance that often hit women harder. However, quotas are a questionable tool because they risk entrenching problems, giving ammunition to those who claim women are too thin-skinned. Parity at all costs displaces merit and competence.
Social movements that are accommodating and neurotic, which perpetuate stereotypes and grant moral superiority to those with the worst circumstances, do not work; they come with a built-in defect. It’s essential to approach feminism from a different and courageous perspective: WOMANISM, allowing us to keep advancing without polarizing relationships, where women are respected without usurping their positions, and where radical feminist collaborators and propagandists who waste time while the globalist agenda destroys Humanity as a whole are no longer given a platform.
