We constantly hear talk of sustainable resource management, with sanitation and drinking water for all.  The so-called climate change is the enemy to beat and renewable energies and mindful consumption are the solution. The reality is that there have already been moves to expropriate land in order to control food production and the drinking water supply¹.  As an essential resource to stay alive, the privatization of water will place us in hands of these vast waterguards; investment funds that are monopolizing the concessions.  As lawyer Pilar Esquinas, expert in water law, explains, springs and aquifers belong to large industrial groups (Nestlé, Danone, Solán de Cabras, etc.) who apply the savage rules of the market.  They play with water in the stock market and decide on our right to consume it, or on what taxes we pay depending on what use (urban, agricultural, etc.) we make of it.  This water mafia is protected by national governments who manipulate the climate by decree and poison us to maintain safe alliances (also) with pharmaceutical companies.  Both Spain² and France have passed climate change laws that seek to increase fiscal pressure through green taxes, such as the carbon tax, monopolize electricity grids and coerce us to install smart meters that can be controlled from the outside.  The result will be the expulsion of small producers, the impoverishment and deindustrialization of countries, and the loss of our energy independence. Electric cars, silent and very expensive, are penetrating a society with serious difficulties to make ends meet, especially now with skyrocketing energy prices, and whose inhabitants will find it increasingly difficult to have access to a vehicle and thus, to their individual freedom.  Any measure to solve the ecological imbalance, conceals punches to the economy of the ordinary population.  It is globalism’s most basic move: to champion a legitimate cause to justify the curtailment of liberties; in this case, forcing us to use "alternative" energies with inflated benefits and punishing those who insist on using the obsolete gasoline.  And if the cause makes no sense or has been disarmed by an important circle of the scientific community: it doesn't matter, because complying with what is established is above reason.  Mikhail Gorbachev himself made historic declarations in 1996 when stating "the threat of an environmental crisis will be the key to the international disaster to unlock the New World Order". The recently deceased Russian leader foreshadowed with his own words the manipulative mechanism of the 2030 Agenda.

Timothy Wirth, a Democratic senator during Bill Clinton's term in office, bluntly affirmed that, "even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy".  In other words, it has long been clear to those in power that global warming is a product that must be sold at all costs.  This line of thought is reflected in studies such as the one published in 2012 in the journal Nature³, a paradigmatic and current example of the farce that says that humans are environment’s main destroyer, which concludes that droughts and hurricanes have not experienced substantial increases in the last 60 years.  A statistic based on a little more than 100 years cannot lead us to draw hasty conclusions that turn the world and our state of welfare upside down.  During the 1970s, the fashionable terror was, oddly enough, that the Earth was cooling and that we were getting dangerously close to the next great ice age.  The states dispute back and forth, focusing on random data to fabricate charts of apocalyptic and dizzying rising temperatures, while avoiding those that didn't fit their bias.  Did you know that May of 2013 was the coldest month since 1965?  Or that March of this very year was the eighth coldest month of the century?  You probably haven’t heard about these statistics on TV while details of the Sahara winds and heat waves were being well delivered.