Pavel Durov and the dirty war against freedom
9 September, 2024Where does humanism stand when technology is used to kill?
11 October, 20248 October, 2024
The celebration of International Identity Day, spearheaded by corporations like Thales, is another example of how globalist agendas are being pushed under the guise of humanistic values and the new social credit established through companies.
Far from promoting personal freedom, these initiatives are vehicles for imposing the United Nations' Agenda 2030—a framework that, in the name of “inclusion” and “progress,” seeks to centralize power and erode national sovereignty.
At its core, the 2030 Agenda uses concepts like "identity" to manipulate and control populations. By creating a narrative that digital identity is essential for security and convenience, powerful institutions normalize surveillance technologies—such as facial recognition, biometrics, and data collection. While these innovations are presented as progressive, they mask a more sinister reality: they are tools to track and influence individuals, enforcing a top-down control structure under the guise of global cooperation.
The real issue lies in the centralization of data. Companies and governments alike now hold immense power over personal information, far beyond what most people realize. Google, Amazon, and Facebook, in collaboration with international organizations, gather and exploit our data to shape behavior and decisions. Digital identification systems, instead of empowering individuals, bind them to centralized systems where privacy is systematically stripped away.
Instead of celebrating a day that promotes these dangerous ideas, we should be advocating for a system that truly respects personal sovereignty. Self sovereign identity—where individuals own and control their data without corporate or government interference—is the only path that ensures real freedom. Decentralized technologies, like blockchain, offer alternatives that can protect personal autonomy and restore the balance of power.
Beyond just technology, the concept of corporate social credit, now increasingly present in Western business models, reflects the same manipulative tactics. Companies are forced to comply with globalist quotas on diversity and inclusion, risking financial penalties and market exclusion if they don't align. This coercion, sold as "social responsibility," that hides a corporate social credit strategy like they do in China with people - undermines free enterprise and innovation in favor of rigid, globalist standards.
The celebration of International Identity Day is a dangerous precedent. It is not about protecting individual rights but about creating a system of digital control. As citizens, we must push back against these initiatives disguised as progress and demand a future where technology empowers us rather than subjugates us.
I propose the creation of a truly powerful certification called People First Decentralized Technology.
Companies that obtain this certification will commit to protecting data privacy by implementing technologies that return total control of personal information to individuals, eliminating any possibility of exploitation by corporations. They will foster transparency by holding companies accountable for how they collect, use, and store our data. They will promote decentralization by adopting technological solutions that ensure data is not concentrated in the hands of a few powerful entities. Of course, these companies will reject manipulative practices, combating corporate social credit systems that dehumanize employees and customers, and ensuring that every business policy aligns with individual freedom and sovereignty.
This certification would be more than a symbol; it would be a rallying cry for those companies willing to demonstrate a genuine commitment to defending human rights, placing the dignity of individuals above any globalist agenda.
As individuals, it is crucial that we take an active role in this fight for personal self-sovereignty and privacy. Every time we choose a brand or support a company, we vote with our money. Therefore, we must be critical and question the practices of the companies we choose to support.