Where does humanism stand when technology is used to kill?
11 October, 2024
Polio vaccine: risks and contradictions
5 November, 2024
29 October, 2024
What was once presented as the only viable solution to control the spread of a virus is now revealed to be a hasty pharmaceutical and medical poisoned intervention system fraught with irregularities.
Studies continue to emerge demonstrating that Covid vaccines, far from being the lifeline that was promised to us, have caused a multitude of adverse side effects and jeopardised the health of millions of people worldwide.
These side effects, which were initially minimised or attributed to isolated cases, are now acknowledged in research showing alarming patterns of cardiovascular, neurological, and other health issues. The growing body of evidence points to a colossal deception, where economic and political interests have prevailed over the well-being of the population. The COVID-19 vaccines, like others, were not only ineffective but also dangerous.
An urgent call: global ban on blood donations from vaccinated individuals
A recent Japanese study has exposed one of these realities, intentionally ignored by health authorities and the media: the blood of individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 may be contaminated, and the risks associated with transfusions from this blood are enormous.
This study, titled "Concerns about transfusions of blood products derived from recipients of genetic vaccines and proposed specific measures," leaves no room for doubt. Researchers have called for a global ban on blood donations from individuals vaccinated with genetic COVID-19 vaccines. Why? Because the adverse effects attributed to the vaccines not only affect those who received them, but now also threaten to contaminate those who depend on blood transfusions.
Research calls for urgent call for governments and regulators to implement specific testing and detection methods to prevent an even greater catastrophe. However, what have we seen so far? Nothing. The complicit silence of the authorities and their refusal to act demonstrate that we are facing a system that prioritises the official narrative over scientific truth.
Ivermectin: the censored drug that could save lives
Meanwhile, the story of ivermectin remains a brutal example of how health elites have intentionally blocked effective treatments to protect their own interests. During the pandemic, this medication was vilified and prohibited for the treatment of COVID-19, despite its proven track record as a safe medication. What few know is that while ivermectin was demonised and censored, cutting-edge research was demonstrating its efficacy in another area: cancer treatment.
An innovative study led by Dr. Mandy Juárez in Mexico, supported by the renowned oncologist Dr. William Makis, has demonstrated that ivermectin is effective in treating multiple types of cancer, including lymphomas, leukaemias, and chemotherapy-resistant cancers. This study tested ivermectin on 28 different types of cancer, and the results were undeniable: ivermectin targets cancer stem cells and enhances the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
Why has this information not been widely disseminated? Because this medication, which costs a fraction of what conventional treatments do, threatens the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical business. Furthermore, in an even darker twist, Dr. Makis has indicated that ivermectin could be the key to treating “turbo cancers” induced by mRNA vaccines, which have proven to be extremely resistant to chemotherapy. Here, the true extent of the conspiracy is revealed: vaccines are not only causing harm to health but have also spurred the emergence of aggressive forms of cancer, while effective treatments like ivermectin have been deliberately blocked.
The decline of autism in a U.S. County
It is no coincidence that, in recent decades, as the childhood vaccination schedule has expanded aggressively, the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (AED) has also increased exponentially. Critics attempt to ridicule those who warn of this relationship, but the numbers do not lie. Cases of autism have soared in parallel with the rise in mandatory vaccines.
According to the findings of an impressive sample of 224 different studies, a direct correlation has been observed between events that activate the immune system, such as vaccinations, and the development of severe neurological disorders.
The levels of inflammatory cytokines in children with autism are through the roof. Studies show disproportionately high levels of certain markers (known as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) that indicate chronic inflammation in the bodies of these children. These proteins, responsible for the immune response, signal a dangerous dysregulation. This constant inflammation is a clear sign that something is profoundly failing within the immune system.
Aluminium, one of the most questioned components of vaccines, is another key factor. In studies with mice, injecting this inflammatory adjuvant produced symptoms that mimic neurological developmental disorders. But we are not just talking about animals: the levels of aluminium in the brains of autistic individuals are brutal. A level of 8.74 µg/g (that is, 8.74 micrograms per gram of brain tissue) of dry aluminium has been recorded in the occipital lobe of a 15-year-old child; one of the highest values ever recorded in human brain tissue.
The prevalence of autism in countries such as the UK, Norway, and Sweden decreased when coverage of the MMR vaccine (the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, which we will discuss later) fell after 1998. When vaccination resumed, autism cases spiked again. Furthermore, premature infants, who receive the same dose as full-term infants, have a risk up to 14.5 times greater of developing neurological developmental disorders.
We are facing a public health catastrophe, causing irreparable harm to an entire generation of children.
Another significant recent study has challenged the official narrative regarding the safety of vaccines and their supposed disconnection from autism. In a county in the United States, parents have begun to resist the recommended vaccination schedule due to growing concerns about side effects and the overall safety of vaccines. The result? A notable decline in autism cases.
The lead researcher of the study, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, an expert on autism prevalence in California, explains that this is not mere coincidence, but direct evidence that vaccines have a direct impact on the neurological development of children.
This study, which should have shaken the foundations of the medical system, has been intentionally ignored by the media and regulatory bodies. The situation is clear: parents who are making the conscious decision not to vaccinate their children are seeing real and measurable benefits in their children's health. This should serve as a warning sign for everyone.
Definitive critical analyses of the MMR vaccine
The measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, known as MMR, was introduced in 1963 and uses live viruses to generate immunity. However, this immunity wanes over time, raising questions about its long-term effectiveness. A compilation of reports published last August in Ciencia y Salud Natural (Science and Natural Health) highlights the lack of oversight regarding these substances, as well as the serious issues they cause in our children.
Focusing on some of the most striking findings from this research, it has been reported that 1 in 640 vaccinated children suffers from seizures, which is five times more common than seizures caused by measles infection. Serious side effects include neurological disorders, epilepsy, and autoimmune diseases, and studies also claim that potential carcinogenic, mutagenic, or fertility-related effects have not been evaluated.
Monitoring adverse effects is problematic. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), used by governments and health organisations, receives approximately 40 annual reports of deaths and permanent injuries related to the MMR vaccine. However, VAERS is a passive reporting system that does not actively seek out cases, leading to a significant underreporting of side effects. The CDC acknowledges that only a small fraction of actual adverse events are reported, estimating that only 1% of serious side effects are notified to these systems.
Moreover, the clinical trials conducted prior to the approval of the MMR vaccine are questionable. The CDC reports that these trials are often small and not designed to detect rare adverse events.
The MMR vaccine provides limited protection to infants during their first year due to a lack of maternal antibodies, increasing the risk of brain damage and death. This vaccine rarely offers lifelong immunity, exposing post-pubertal adults to a higher risk of serious injuries or fatalities.
Tens of toxicants in COVID vaccines
The study titled "At least 55 undeclared chemical elements found in COVID-19 vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm, and Sputnik V, with ICP-MS analysis," conducted by biologists and biotechnologists from Argentina and the United States and published in October of this year, reveals interesting findings about the experimental vaccines.
Researchers from various institutions employed advanced spectrometry techniques to analyse the content of different batches of these vaccines. The results are striking: 55 undeclared chemical elements have been identified, including 11 of the 15 cytotoxic lanthanides used in electronic devices and optogenetics. Heavy metals are also present in concerning quantities, with chromium found in 100% of samples and arsenic in 82%. The heterogeneity of the content suggests that the elemental composition varies even within the same vial.
This study not only challenges the transparency in the production of these vaccines but also highlights the urgent need for a thorough review of their composition and the associated adverse effects. The revelation of these undeclared elements once again calls into question the trust placed by the gullible masses in the health authorities and pharmaceutical companies that have promoted these aggressive vaccination campaigns.
Abortions and other serious health issues for pregnant women
Writer and journalist Naomi Wolf has been a critical voice in investigating the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in pregnant women. Through rigorous analysis and data collection from various sources, Wolf has demonstrated that these injections can have serious consequences for reproductive health. Her studies indicate a disturbing increase in spontaneous abortions, placental inflammation (placentitis), and risks of sterility—effects that have been minimised or ignored by major public health authorities.
Wolf has collaborated with teams of researchers to analyse internal Pfizer documents, revealing concerning patterns of complications in vaccinated pregnant women. Among the findings, placental inflammation stands out, a phenomenon that can lead to developmental issues for the fetus and even to miscarriage. Furthermore, Wolf has noted an increase in reports of spontaneous abortions among pregnant women who received the vaccine. Up to 50% of pregnant women who received the jab report adverse events, with 10% experiencing a spontaneous abortion.
Additionally, Wolf has emphasised that the vaccines may be impacting female fertility. She has gathered data suggesting that some women have experienced severe menstrual problems and irregular cycles following vaccination, which could have long-term implications for their ability to conceive. These adverse effects, according to Wolf, should be a cause for concern and urgency to halt the administration of these injections in pregnant women until more conclusive and transparent studies are conducted.
Vaxxed: from cover-up to catastrophe
Divided into two parts, Vaxxed is a documentary that delves deeply into the irregularities and manipulations in scientific studies that obscure the true effects of vaccines.
The first part (2016) investigates the relationship between the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine and severe side effects such as autism. Through testimonies from experts and parents of affected children, the film reveals how the FDA and CDC deliberately concealed studies evidencing this link.
Directed by Andrew Wakefield, a physician with years of experience who has been researching the topic since the 1990s, the documentary exposes his findings, some of which were published in prestigious journals like The Lancet.
In 2019, the second part, "Vaxxed: The People's Truth," was released, expanding the investigation into the damage caused by vaccines in infants worldwide. This instalment dives into the stories of affected families and features notable figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Jimmy Kimmel.
You can watch both parts of Vaxxed (in English) below.
